Post by enquirer on Feb 2, 2019 8:22:51 GMT
Assalaamu alaykum.
It is known that al-Zamakhshari, the author of al-Kashaf, was from the mu'tazilah. Hence, we do not take from his 'aqeedah and are to be wary of such implications in his tafseer.
However, what do the scholars say about his works of fiqh?
I came across a book, which I later realised was by him, titled رؤوس المسائل, a book which succinctly compares the hanafi and shafi'i positions in fiqh. Is this to be avoided?
It is known that al-Zamakhshari, the author of al-Kashaf, was from the mu'tazilah. Hence, we do not take from his 'aqeedah and are to be wary of such implications in his tafseer.
However, what do the scholars say about his works of fiqh?
I came across a book, which I later realised was by him, titled رؤوس المسائل, a book which succinctly compares the hanafi and shafi'i positions in fiqh. Is this to be avoided?