|
Post by AbuHumayd on Dec 14, 2015 16:56:14 GMT
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته
Brother Yusuf, the incident which you have posted is not narrated in the Ṣaḥīḥayn, as mentioned by Mawlānā Abu Idris; however, it is narrated in the Mustadrak of Imām al-Ḥākim (2/110 #1726):
أخبرناه أبو محمد عبد الله بن محمد بن موسى العدل ، من أصل كتابه ، ثنا محمد بن صالح الكيليني ، ثنا محمد بن يحيى بن أبي عمرو العدني ، ثنا عبد العزيز بن عبد الصمد العمي ، عن أبي هارون العبدي ، عن أبي سعيد الخدري - رضي الله عنه - قال : حججنا مع عمر بن الخطاب ، فلما دخل الطواف استقبل الحجر ، فقال : إني أعلم أنك حجر لا تضر ، ولا تنفع ، ولولا أني رأيت رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم - قبلك ما قبلتك ، ثم قبله ، فقال له [ ص: 110 ] علي بن أبي طالب بلى يا أمير المؤمنين إنه يضر وينفع . قال : ثم قال : بكتاب الله تبارك وتعالى . قال : وأين ذلك من كتاب الله ؟ قال : قال الله عز وجل : وإذ أخذ ربك من بني آدم من ظهورهم ذريتهم وأشهدهم على أنفسهم ألست بربكم قالوا بلى خلق الله آدم ومسح على ظهره فقررهم بأنه الرب ، وأنهم العبيد ، وأخذ عهودهم ومواثيقهم ، وكتب ذلك في رق ، وكان لهذا الحجر عينان ولسان ، فقال له افتح فاك . قال : ففتح فاه فألقمه ذلك الرق وقال : اشهد لمن وافاك بالموافاة يوم القيامة ، وإني أشهد لسمعت رسول الله - صلى الله عليه وآله وسلم - : " يؤتى يوم القيامة بالحجر الأسود ، وله لسان ذلق ، يشهد لمن يستلمه بالتوحيد " فهو يا أمير المؤمنين يضر وينفع ، فقال عمر : أعوذ بالله أن أعيش في قوم لست فيهم يا أبا حسن .
Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī also relates it in his Fatḥ (3/463) and concludes:
وفي إسناده أبو هارون العبدي وهو ضعيف جدا
"In its chain is Abū Hārūn al-‘Abdī and he is severely weak."
I would like to point out that the latter portion of this narration attributed to the Prophet ﷺ has been narrated separately in many books of ḥadīth with similar wording:
يؤتى يوم القيامة بالحجر الأسود ، وله لسان ذلق ، يشهد لمن يستلمه بالتوحيد
However with the wording بحق being authentically reported instead of بالتوحيد.
For example Imam al-Tirmidhī narrated in his Sunan (882):
قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي الْحَجَرِ : " وَاللَّهِ لَيَبْعَثَنَّهُ اللَّهُ يَوْمَ الْقِيَامَةِ لَهُ عَيْنَانِ يُبْصِرُ بِهِمَا ، وَلِسَانٌ يَنْطِقُ بِهِ يَشْهَدُ عَلَى مَنِ اسْتَلَمَهُ بِحَقٍّ " . قَالَ أَبُو عِيسَى : هَذَا حَدِيثٌ حَسَنٌ .
From Ibn ‘Abbās that he said: Rasūlullāh ﷺ said regarding the (black) stone: "By Allāh! Allāh will raise it on the Day of Resurrection with two eyes by which it sees and a tongue that it speaks with, testifying to whoever touched it in truth." Abū ‘Īsā (al-Tirmidhī) said: 'This is a ḥasan ḥadīth.'
And Allāh knows best.
|
|
|
Post by AbuHumayd on Dec 5, 2015 17:07:57 GMT
﷽
The black stone (al-Ḥajar 'l-Aswad) has many virtues, one of them is the ability to clear your sins (by Allāh's leave) when you kiss or touch it, Imām al-Tirmidhī has related in his Jāmi‘ (877): حدثنا قتيبة حدثنا جرير عن عطاء بن السائب عن سعيد بن جبير عن ابن عباس قال قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم
نزل الحجر الأسود من الجنة وهو أشد بياضا من اللبن فسودته خطايا بني آدم قال وفي الباب عن عبد الله بن عمرو وأبي هريرة قال أبو عيسى حديث ابن عباس حديث حسن صحيح (Imām al-Tirmidhī says) Qutaybah related to us, who said Jarīr narrated to us from ‘Atā' ibn al-Sā'ib from Sa‘īd ibn Jubayr from Ibn ‘Abbās who said: Rasūlullāh ﷺ said: "The black stone descended from paradise and was (originally) whiter than milk while the sins of the sons of Ādam turned it black." Imām al-Tirmidhī comments: "There is another ḥadīth from ‘Abdullāh ibn ‘Amr and Abū Hurayrah concerning this chapter, and the ḥadīth of Ibn ‘Abbās is a ḥasan ṣaḥīḥ ḥadīth." Mullā ‘Alī al-Qārī comments on the words "sons of Ādam turned it black" to mean: أي صارت ذنوب بني آدم الذين يمسحون الحجر سيا لسواده Meaning: "The sins of the sons of Ādam made it turn black due to touching the (black) stone." Mirqāt 'l-Mafātīḥ (9/45) Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī points out in his Fatḥ 'l-Bārī sharḥ Ṣaḥīḥ 'l-Bukhārī (3/462): ومنها حديث ابن عباس مرفوعا : نزل الحجر الأسود من الجنة وهو أشد بياضا من اللبن ، فسودته خطايا بني آدم . أخرجه الترمذي وصححه ، وفيه عطاء بن السائب وهو صدوق لكنه اختلط ، وجرير ممن سمع منه بعد اختلاطه ، لكن له طريق أخرى في صحيح ابن خزيمة فيقوى بها ، وقد رواه النسائي من طريق حماد بن سلمة ، عن عطاء مختصرا ، ولفظه الحجر الأسود من الجنة وحماد ممن سمع من عطاء قبل الاختلاط ، "From those narrations is the ḥadīth of Ibn ‘Abbās marfū‘an (raised back to the Prophet): 'The black stone descended from paradise and was (originally) whiter than milk while the sins of the sons of Ādam turned it black.' Imām al-Tirmidhī narrated it and authenticated it. In it [the isnād] is ‘Aṭā' ibn 'l-Sā'ib, he is trustworthy but he suffered from ikhthilāṭ [mixing up narrations in the latter stage of his life], and Jarīr was from those who heard from him after his ikhthilāṭ [meaning there is weakness]. However, there is another route for this as narrated in Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaymah [2557] that gives it strength. Whilst al-Nasā'ī [3801] narrated a shorter version from Ḥammād ibn Salamah from ‘Aṭā' with the wording (only) being: 'The black stone descended from paradise.' Ḥammād was from those who heard ‘Aṭā' before he (‘Aṭā') suffered from ikhthilāṭ [meaning the narrations of Ḥammād from ‘Aṭā' are sound]." It is worth noting that the words of the narration in Jāmi‘ al-Tirmidhī: "The black stone was (originally) whiter than milk while the sins of the sons of Ādam turned it black", without the wording that it 'descended from heaven', has also been narrated via Ḥammād from ‘Aṭā' as mentioned in the Mu‘jam 'l-Kabīr of al-Ṭabarānī (1215) with the wording being 'whiter than ice' instead of 'milk': حَدَّثَنَا بِشْرُ بْنُ مُوسَى ، ثنا يَحْيَى بْنُ إِسْحَاقَ السَّيْلَحِينِيُّ ، ثنا حَمَّادُ بْنُ سَلَمَةَ ، عَنْ عَطَاءِ بْنِ السَّائِبِ ، عَنْ سَعِيدِ بْنِ جُبَيْرٍ ، عَنِ ابْنِ عَبَّاسٍ ، قَالَ : قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ : " كَانَ الْحَجَرُ الأَسْوَدُ أَشَدَّ بَيَاضًا مِنَ الثَّلْجِ حَتَّى سَوَّدَتْهُ خَطَايَا بَنِي آدَمَ " Imām Ḍiyā' 'l-Dīn al-Maqdisī incorporated this ḥadīth in his book: al-Aḥādīth 'l-Mukhtārah (3614) where he strived to compile only authentic narrations. Some objectors to this virtue utilise a narration in Ṣaḥīḥ 'l-Bukhārī (1520) from ‘Umar ibn 'l-Khaṭṭāb that he came close to al-Ḥajar 'l-Aswad and kissed it, and that he then said: إني أعلم أنك حجر لا تضر ولا تنفع ولولا أني رأيت النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم يقبلك ما قبلتك "No doubt, I know that you are [only] a stone, you cannot cause harm nor can you benefit. Had I not seen the Prophet ﷺ kissing you, I would not have kissed you." Commenting on this narration Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar says in short: قوله : ( لا تضر ولا تنفع ) أي إلا بإذن الله "‘Umar's saying 'you cannot cause harm nor can you benefit', meaning: 'except by the leave of Allāh." (Ibid). Meaning that whatever Alāh ﷻ wills, He can do. And Allāh ﷻ knows best.
|
|
|
Post by AbuHumayd on Oct 17, 2015 10:00:13 GMT
Translator's prefaceThe following Fatwā of the Egyptian Dār al-Iftā’ is of great importance as it concerns one of the major pillars of Islām; Ṣalāh, and has become a point of contention among a group of Muslims. While some finer details of the Fatwā may depart from Ḥanafī stances, it is nevertheless of great benefit in dealing with the core issue. Overall, the proofs and line of argument in this Fatwā will surely bring to light the reality of the issue in terms of rational and textual evidences with the sound verdicts of the scholars.
حكم قضاء الصلاة الفائتة Ruling on Making up the Missed [Obligatory] Prayer
Answered by: Dār al-Iftā' al-Misriyyah[1] The making up (Qaḍā') of prayer missed unintentionally is obligatory according to the scholarly consensus (Ijmā‘), with ibn Rushd, ibn Qudāmah, al-Nawawī and others relating Ijmā‘ in this regard. Likewise, it is obligatory to make up the intentionally missed [obligatory prayer] according to the vast majority of Fuqahā' (jurists), and this has been the practice of the Salaf and their successors (Khalaf). In fact, al-Nawawī related consensus of the credible scholars regarding this [obligation], and was of the opinion that those who differed on this issue had violated Ijmā‘. It is obligatory to make up the missed prayers however many they may be. And when the [number of] missed prayers exceed five, the [obligation in the] sequence [of prayers] will be deferred. If [however] he does not know the actual number requiring Qaḍā', then he should continue to make them up until he is certain that he has discharged himself of the obligation. Thus, it has been narrated from Imām Aḥmad regarding a man who misses prayer: “'He should make up until there remains no doubt that he has fulfilled that which he has neglected.” The observance of prayer at its rightful time is among the most basic attributes of a Muslim. As [Allāh ﷻ] the Most High said: 'Verily the prayer is prescribed upon the believers at fixed hours' [ Sūrat al-Nisā': 103]. Also, it is well-established in Sharī‘āh that Ṣalāh, like all acts of worship stipulated for specific times, will have come to pass when unperformed at the expiry of the set time, and will remain an obligation until it has been fulfilled. Likewise, there is consensus (Ijmā‘) regarding the obligation of making up the prayer missed unintentionally due to forgetfulness or error. As for the one who abandons prayer intentionally, then the four followed schools (Madhhabs) and the majority of jurists from the Salaf and Khalaf are of the view that this person is sinful but is nevertheless under an obligation to make Qaḍā' of the missed prayers however many they may be, and that Qaḍā' takes precedence over the praying of Nawāfil (supererogatory prayers) due to the saying of the Prophet ﷺ: “The debt due to Allāh is more deserving of being paid off.” Narrated by Imām Muslim in his Ṣaḥīḥ. At the same time, repentance from this great sin [of missing prayers] is also obligatory upon him. The majority of scholars utilise as proof the Ḥadith of Anas رضي الله عنه from the Prophet ﷺ, narrated by al-Bukhārī and Muslim, that he ﷺ said: “Whoever forgets a prayer he should pray [it] as soon as he remembers, for there is no Kaffārah (atonement) for it (the missed prayer) except that [meaning; by fulfilling it].” [Allāh said]: 'Establish the Prayer for my mention (dhikr)' [ Sūrah Ṭaḥā: 14]. Subsequently, if Qaḍā' is necessary upon the forgetful, who is even excused by Sharī‘ah in many matters, then it is more appropriate that the deliberate person is duty-bound to perform Qaḍā', as he is not excused. These scholars also utilise as proof the Ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah رضي الله عنه that: 'The Prophet ﷺ commanded one who engaged in sexual intercourse during the day of Ramaḍān to fast [an extra] day and give Kaffārah.' That is, in expiation for the day [the fast of] which he broke by intentionally engaging in intercourse. This has been narrated by al-Bayhaqī with a good chain, with Abū Dāwūd having a similar narration. Hence, this establishes the obligation of fulfilling acts of worship that were deliberately missed out, since there is no difference [between the intentional and unintentional]. Imām ibn Rushd says in Bidāyat al-Mujtahid: 'As for the one upon whom Qaḍā' is obligatory, then the Muslims are in agreement that this is obligatory on the one who forgets and the one who sleeps [through prayer], but they differed regarding the one who intentionally misses it and the one who is unconscious[at the time of prayer]...and as for the one who neglects prayer intentionally until the prayer time has passed, then the majority of the scholars consider him to be a sinner and hold that Qaḍā' is obligatory upon him. However, some of the Ẓāhirī (literalist) scholars hold the view that he will not make Qaḍā' but remain a sinner. Of those that held this opinion is Abū Muḥammad ibn Ḥazm. In al-‘Ināyah Sharḥ al-Hidāyah[8], a book of the Ḥanafīs, [it says]: 'And one who has [unintentionally] missed prayer or has done so deliberately, then Qaḍā' is obligatory upon him when he remembers.' It is mentioned in the Mukhtaṣar of Imam Khalīl al-Mālikī and its commentaries, like that of al-Kharshī and al-Dardīr: 'Chapter: It is obligatory to make Qaḍā' of a missed prayer without exception. This means that it is obligatory upon the accountable person (Mukallaf) to make it up immediately, regardless of whether he missed it intentionally or by error. [Qāḍī] ‘Iyād said: ‘An aberrant opinion has been transmitted from [Imām] Mālik that the 'Qaḍā' of a person who deliberately misses it is waived. However, this [view] is not authentically transmitted from him or from anyone else.’ In al-Muhadh-dhab of Shaykh Abū Isḥāq al-Shīrāzī al-Shāfi‘ī [it states]: 'The one upon whom prayer had become obligatory but did not perform it until the time [of prayer] had elapsed, Qaḍā' becomes necessary on him due to the saying of the Prophet ﷺ: “Whoever sleeps through prayer or forgets [to perform] it then he should pray as soon as he remembers.” Thus it is preferable (Mustaḥabb) for him to make it up immediately due to the Ḥadīth we have mentioned [above]. However, it is also permissible for him to delay it as it has been narrated that the Prophet ﷺ missed Fajr and did not make it up until he had exited the valley. Hence, if immediately making it up was necessary then he ﷺ would not have delayed Qaḍā'. It is also preferable (Mustaḥabb) to make up the missed prayers in order, because the Prophet ﷺ missed four prayers on the day of Khandaq (Battle of the Trenches) and made them up according to the sequence [of the missed prayers]. Therefore, if a person makes them up without order, it will still be permissible as [the obligation of] sequence arises on account of the time [of prayer], and as such it is waived by the passing of that [prescribed] time.'[2] Imām al-Nawawī states in his commentary on al-Muhadh-dhab: 'The scholars whose opinions are taken into consideration are of the consensus that one who abandons prayer intentionally is obligated to make it up Ibn Ḥazm disagreed and said: “It is never possible for him to make up the missed prayers, and to perform it is never correct.” He then said: “Instead, he should abundantly carry out good deeds and perform supererogatory prayers in order that his Scale (Mīzan) may be heavy on the day of Qiyāmah, and he should seek forgiveness from Allāh and repent.” [Imām] al-Nawawī [then] states: 'That which he – Ibn Ḥazm – has mentioned, as well as opposing consensus, is invalid in terms of evidence. While he has discussed at great length in establishing proofs for this [view], what he has brought is by no means any evidence.' And among the proofs that indicate the obligation of Qaḍā' is the Ḥadīth of Abū Hurayrah رضي الله عنه: 'That the Prophet ﷺ commanded one who engaged in sexual intercourse during the day of Ramaḍān to fast [an extra] day and give Kaffārah.' That is, in expiation for the day [the fast of] which he broke by intentionally engaging in intercourse. This has been narrated by al-Bayhaqī with a good chain, with Abū Dāwūd having a similar narration. Moreover, if Qaḍā' is obligatory upon the one who misses it forgetfully, then the intentional one is surely more duty-bound. The opinion that it is obligatory to make up missed prayer unconditionally is also what the Ḥanbalīs conform to. Some, however, have differed with regard to the intentionally missed prayer. It is recorded in al-Inṣāf of al-Mardāwī: 'Whoever has missed prayers it is obligatory upon him to make them up immediately. This is the [Ḥanbalī] Madh-hab which has been clearly mentioned, and which is the view of most fellow [Ḥanbalī] scholars, with many expressly affirming this…however, Shaykh Taqī 'l-Dīn [ibn Taymiyyah] has preferred the view that, if the one who intentionally neglects prayer repents, there is no Qaḍā' stipulated for him and [doing so] would not be correct of him. Rather he should abundantly carry out supererogatory deeds and also keep fasts. Ibn Rajab says in his commentary on Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī: 'It is found in the statements of some of our early (mutaqaddimīn) scholars that making Qaḍā' will not suffice for a person who has wilfully neglected it.' Based on the view held by the majority of scholars that making Qaḍā' of the prayer missed deliberately is obligatory, a person whose missed prayers are numerous (i.e. more than five) the [obligation of making them up in] sequence will be deferred in relation to him, and it will be permissible for him to make them up whenever he wishes. Thus, he can make Qaḍā' after every new Farḍ prayer by performing one or more of the missed prayers he is required to make up. In this manner after many years it will be very likely for him that he has fully discharged his duty. Imām Ibn Qudāmah al-Ḥanbalī says in al-Mughnī: 'If he has many missed prayers he should busy himself with making them up as long as he experiences no physical or financial difficulty in this...and if he does not know the number [of missed prayers] required of him, then he should continue making up until he is certain that he has freed himself of this obligation.' Imām Aḥmad said in a narration of Ṣāliḥ regarding the man who misses prayer: “He should make up until there remains no doubt that he has fulfilled that which he has neglected.” So he should confine himself to only making up the missed obligatory prayers and should not pray the [missed] supererogatory (Nāwafil) and Sunnah prayers in the meantime. This is because the Prophet ﷺ missed four prayers on the day of Khandaq so he ordered Bilāl رضي الله عنه to give the call to prayer [Iqāmah] and then performed Ẓuhr. Thereafter, he instructed Bilal again to give Iqāmah and prayed ‘Asr, after which he made Bilal give Iqāmah and prayed Maghrib. The Prophet ﷺ once again asked him to give Iqāmah and then completed ‘Ishā'. In this narration there is no mention that the Prophet ﷺ prayed the [missed] Sunnah prayers during the interval in between [the Farḍ prayers]. Furthermore, Farḍ prayers are far more significant, so being preoccupied with them takes primacy unless the [missed] prayers are few in number – in which case there is no harm in making up the emphasised Sunnah prayers. The reason being is that the Prophet ﷺ once missed Fajr so he prayed its [two Rak‘āts] Sunnah before [making up] the Farḍ.
[1] The link to the original fatwā online: m.dar-alifta.org/ViewFatwa.aspx?ID=3627&LangID=1[2] [Translator's note] The Ḥanafīs have differed regarding the tartīb [order] of the Qaḍā' prayers, they have said it is obligatory to make it up in order; al-Mawsū‘at 'l-Fiqhiyyah (12/162)
|
|
|
Post by AbuHumayd on Oct 2, 2015 10:32:00 GMT
باب قضاء ركعتي الفجر قبل طلوع الشمس Chapter on making up (Qaḍhā') the 2 Rak‘āts [Sunnah] of Fajr before the rising of the sun
‘Allāmah Muḥammad ibn ‘Alī al-Nīmawī [d. 1322 A.H] رحمه الله Translator's preface The following is an excerpt translated from the footnotes of Āthār al-Sunan [ al-Ta‘līq 'l-Ḥasan][1] of the Ḥadīth master, ‘Allāmah al-Nīmawī[2]. In this chapter, the author first critiques a narration with an interrupted (Munqaṭi‘) chain regarding the permissibility of praying the two Sunnah Rak‘āts of Fajr before sunrise, having already completed the two Farḍh Rak‘āts. He then mentions a similar, but fully connected, chain found in Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaymah, Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān and al-Ḥākim's Mustadrak[3]. The narration is as follows: حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو الْعَبَّاسِ مُحَمَّدُ بْنُ يَعْقُوبَ ، ثنا الرَّبِيعُ بْنُ سُلَيْمَانَ ، ثنا أَسَدُ بْنُ مُوسَى ، ثنا اللَّيْثُ بْنُ سَعْدٍ ، عَنْ يَحْيَى بْنِ سَعِيدٍ ، عَنْ أَبِيهِ ، عَنْ جَدِّهِ ، أَنَّهُ جَاءَ وَالنَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ يُصَلِّي صَلَاةَ الْفَجْرِ فَصَلَّى مَعَهُ ، فَلَمَّا سَلَّمَ قَامَ فَصَلَّى رَكْعَتَيِ الْفَجْرِ ، فَقَالَ: لَهُ النَّبِيُّ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ " مَا هَاتَانِ الرَّكْعَتَانِ ؟ " فَقَالَ: لَمْ أَكُنْ صَلَّيْتُهُمَا قَبْلَ الْفَجْرِ ، فَسَكَتَ وَلَمْ يَقُلْ شَيْئًا " Abu'l ‘Abbās related to us (who said), al-Rabi‘ ibn Sulaymān narrated to us (who said), Asad ibn Mūsā related to us (who said), al-Layth ibn Sa‘d related to us from Yaḥyā ibn Sa‘īd, from his father (Sa‘īd ibn Qays), from his grandfather (Qays ibn ‘Amr (رضي الله عنه)): That he arrived while the Prophet (صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) was praying the Fajr prayer so he (Qays) prayed with him (صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ). After making Salām (in completion of Fajr), Qays immediately stood up and prayed the two Rak‘āts (Sunnah) of Fajr. So the Prophet (صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) asked him: “What are these two Rak'āts?” Qays replied: “I had not performed them (Sunnah Rak'āts) before [the Farḍh of] Fajr.” On hearing this, the Prophet (صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ) remained silent and did not say anything. To this, ‘Allāmah al-Nīmāwī replied: فقد جاء متصلا من رواية يحيى بن سعيد عن أبيه عن جده قيس رواه ابن خزيمة في صحيحه وابن حبان من طريقه وطريق غيره والبيهقي في سننه عن يحيى بن سعيد عن أبيه عن جده قيس المكذور إنتهى قلت إن في سماع سعيد بن قيس من أبيه نظرا قال ابن عبد البر فى الاستيعاب في ترجمة قيس بن عمرو يقولون ان سعيدا والد يحيى بن سعيد لم يسمع من أبيه شيئا انتهى قلت و مع ذلك هذه الطريق غير محفوظة تفرد بها اسد بن موسى عن الليث عن يحيى بن سعيد والمحفوظ عن يحيى بن سعيد ارساله قال ابو داود روى عبد ربه و يحيى ابنا سعيد هذا الحديث مرسلا ان جدهم الخ وقال الحافظ بن حجر فى الاصابة واخرجه ابن منده من طريق اسد بن موسى عن الليث عن يحيى عن ابيه عن جده و قال غريب تفرد به اسد موصولا و قال غيره عن الليث عن يحيى ان حديثه مرسل انتهى كلامه وقال العلامة يوسف بن موسى فى المعتصر من المختصر وما روي الليث بن سعد عن يحيى بن سعيد عن أبيه عن جده قيس بن قهد ثم ساقه ثم قال فهو فى الأحاديث التي لا يحتج بمثلها لعلة في رواته ذكرت مفصلة فى المطول إنتهى كلامه فإن قلت هذه زيادة من الثقة وزيادة الثقة مقبولة مطلقا كما ذهب إليه النووي في غير موضع تصانيفه قلت العبرة للأقوي والأرجح This Hadith has also been transmitted via a fully connected chain from Yaḥyā ibn Sa‘īd from his father, from his grandfather, Qays, by the following Hadith scholars: ibn Khuzaymah in his Ṣaḥīḥ, ibn Ḥibbān, who narrates it via this chain as well as a second one, and al-Bayhaqī in his Sunan with the same chain as mentioned above. I (al-Nimawī) say: To begin with, there is a problem in the Samā‘ (listening/hearing of Hādīth) of Sa‘īd ibn Qays from his father (Qays ibn ‘Amr (رضي الله عنه)). Ibn 'Abd al-Barr states in al-Istī‘āb[4] under the biography of Qays ibn 'Amr (رضي الله عنه): 'They (the Hadith scholars) say: Sa‘īd - the father of Yaḥyā Ibn Sa‘īd - did not hear anything (i.e. Hadith) from his father (Qays ibn 'Amr)'. I (al-Nimawī) say: To add to this also is the fact that this chain is not well preserved (Ghair Mahfuẓ); Asad ibn Mūsā is alone in narrating this from al-Layth from Yaḥyā ibn Sa‘īd. Rather the preserved chain of Yaḥyā ibn Sa‘īd is a Mursal narration (i.e. that which is not fully connected, hence defective). Abū Dāwūd said: ”‘Abd Rabbih and Yaḥyā, sons of Sa‘īd, narrated this Hadīth via a Mursal chain that their grandfather...”[5]. Al-Ḥafiẓ ibn Ḥajar (al-‘Asqalānī) says in al-Iṣābah: 'And ibn Mandah narrated it via the chain of Asad ibn Mūsā from al-Layth, from Yaḥyā, from his father (Sa‘īd), from his grandfather (Qays رضي الله عنه), and stated: ‘This is a gharīb narration (i.e. the chain contains a solitary narrator at one stage) with Asad (ibn Mūsā) being alone in narrating it with a complete chain.' Others have similarly held that this Hadith of al-Layth from Yaḥyā (from his grandfather) is Mursal.'[6] ‘Allāmah Yūsuf ibn Mūsā said in al-Mu‘taṣar min 'l-Mukhtaṣar: 'And the Hadith which al-Layth ibn Sa‘d narrated from Yaḥyā ibn Sa‘id, from his father, from his grandfather, Qays ibn Qahd.’ Then having quoted the narration stated: ‘This is among those Hadiths which cannot be used as evidence due to the presence of an ‘Illah (hidden defect) in its narrators, which has been expounded upon in larger works.’ But if you were to say that this addition (Ziyādah) [of the chain being fully connected] is from a trustworthy narrator[7], and that the Ziyādah of a trustworthy narrator is accepted unconditionally, as opined by al-Nawawī in many places in his works, then I state [the maxim]: Decisive is the most sound and correct [chain].
[1] Āthār 'l-Sunan ma‘ l-Ta‘līq 'l-Ḥasan (Kitāb al-Ṣalah p.187) [2] He is; ‘Allāmah Muḥammad ibn ‘Alī al-Nīmawī [d. 1322 A.H] رحمه الله [3] Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Khuzaymah (#1597), Ṣaḥīḥ Ibn Ḥibbān (#2525), al-Mustadrak of Ḥākim (#955), the wording being of Imām al-Ḥākim. [4] Imām ibn ‘Abd al-Barr, al-Istī‘āb (1/401). [5] Sunan Abī Dāwūd (#1267) [6] Ḥāfiẓ ibn Ḥajar, al-Iṣābah (5/491) [7] Ziyādat 'l-Thiqāt is not an agreed upon principle to begin with, some regarded those narrations that fell under this category to be Shādh [isolated], hence rejected.
|
|
|
Post by AbuHumayd on Sept 23, 2015 21:33:30 GMT
The following is an excerpt translated from Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Taymiyyah's Majmū‘ 'l-Fatāwā (2/397) regarding the following issues: Waḥdat al-Wujūd, Ittiḥād and certain types of utterances in the state of oblivion (Fanā').
Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Taymiyyah writes:
Some have fallen [prey] after being overpowered by the condition in a type of Ḥulūl and Ittiḥād, for indeed there is some truth in it as well as falsehood in [this concept of] Ittiḥād. But when someone enters it [this state] his sense [then] vanishes or that he annihilates himself [to Allāh] (Afnāhu) for only his beloved. There is no sin upon him rather he is excused without any punishment being inflicted upon him due to [him] being not aware [of his actions], for indeed the pen is lifted for the insane until he regains sanity. Even though it was an error [his speech and conduct] he would certainly come under the following verses: 'Our Lord, do not take us to task if we forget or make errors' and: 'There is no sin upon you if you (unintentionally) make a mistake.
For this is similar to (a story) that has been related about two men who both loved each [for the sake of Allāh], where [one of] the Mahbūb (beloved) fell in the water and was drowning so the other went down himself behind him. He [the first one] said: I am drowning [due to falling], why are you drowning [meaning why did you follow me]? So he [the second one] replied: I became immersed in you then I thought that you became me [hence the reason I followed you].
This condition is the state of many from the people of love and will [His will] in the finding of the truth, even though it may lack [from Shar‘ī perspective] and [there maybe] error [which is not a problem] for he has vanished in to his beloved from his (personal) love for himself, to his [Lord's] remembrance from his (personal) remembrance, to know Him from his own (personal) self, to bearing witness to Him than his own self, to exist for Him than exist for himself. So he does not feel at that time [any] awareness nor his (own) existence. He thus utters - after reaching - this state [things like]: 'I am the truth' (Ana 'l-Ḥaqq), or 'Glory be to me' (Subḥānī) or 'There is nothing in my Jubbah except Allāh' (Mā fī 'l-Jubbah illā 'Allāh) or anything similar to those [statements] due to [him] being intoxicated in the love of Allāh for he [at that time] is in delight and intense feeling of happiness that which makes him not aware [of reality].
|
|
|
Post by AbuHumayd on Sept 21, 2015 14:09:02 GMT
Translator's preface The following is an excerpt translated from the chapter: 'A person performing Farḍh (obligatory prayer) behind one praying Nafl (supererogatory prayer)', of Imām Abū Ja‘far al-Ṭaḥāwī's[1] masterpiece; Sharḥ Ma‘ānī 'l-Āthār[2]. This is also the opinion upheld by the majority of the Fuqahā' besides the Ḥanafīs. The Malikī School hold this view and it is a view adhered to by majority of the Ḥanbalīs[3]. بَابُ الرَّجُلِ يُصَلِّي الْفَرِيضَةَ خَلْفَ مَنْ يُصَلِّي تَطَوُّعًا Chapter on the person performing Farḍh behind one praying Nafl
Ḥujjat 'l-Islām Abū Ja‘far al-Ṭaḥāwī رحمه الله [d. 321 AH] Abū Ja‘far (al-Ṭahāwī) says: It has been related from Jābir ibn ‘Abdullāh that Mu‘ādh ibn Jabal would perform ‘Ishā' with the Prophet ﷺ, thereafter return to his people, the Banū Salamah (clan), and lead them in ‘Ishā' again. We have previously mentioned this narration with its chain in the chapter ‘Qirā'ah (recitation) in the Maghrib prayer’. A group of scholars are of the opinion that a person praying Nafl may lead as an Imam those performing Farḍh, and have used as evidence the aforementioned narration. Contrary to this view, however, other scholars hold that it will not be valid for a person to fulfil a Farḍh prayer behind one who is performing Nafl. In proving this, they state that there is nothing categorical in the Hadīth of Mu‘ādh to suggest whether the Ṣalāh performed whilst leading his people was a Farḍh or Nafl act. It may be that he would pray ‘Ishā' as Nafl with the Prophet ﷺ and then come to his people and lead them in the same Ṣalāh, but this time as a Farḍh. So if this was actually the case then the Hadīth will be of no evidence for your (first group’s) view. It is also probable that Mu‘ādh would pray ‘Ishā' with the Prophet ﷺ as Farḍh and then lead his people in it as Nafl, as is your (first group’s) viewpoint. Therefore, both meanings are conceivable from the Hadīth, and one meaning cannot be determined over the other except by proof affirming such a view. So the first group say: We have found in some narrations (āthār) that what Mu‘ādh would pray with his people was Nafl, and that his prayer with the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ would be Farḍh. And they have brought, as proof of this, what Ibrāhīm Ibn Marzūq narrated to us. He said: Abū ‘Āṣim narrated to us from Ibn Jurayj from ‘Amr that he said, “Jābir - may Allāh be pleased with him - informed me that Mu‘ādh would pray ‘Ishā' with the Prophet ﷺ, thereafter return to his people and lead them in it (‘Ishā') again, such that the prayer with his people would be considered Nafl for him, but Farḍh for them. In reply to this, the second group attest that ibn ‘Uyaynah, like ibn Jurayj, narrated the same Hadīth from ‘Amr ibn Dīnār in its entirety, with the content being better preserved than that of ibn Jurayj’s wording, except that he (ibn ‘Uyaynah) did not include in the narration: “for him it is considered Nafl and for the people it is Farḍh”. So accordingly, this latter statement may have originated from one of three narrators: ibn Jurayj[4], ‘Amr ibn Dīnār or Jābir. However, regardless which of the three the statement originates from, it will be of no evidence in determining the reality of Mu‘ādh’s action, as these narrators have not relayed the statement from Mu‘ādh himself, but have made their own observations regarding his actions. Therefore, it is entirely possible that the reverse is true (i.e. his Salāh with the Prophet ﷺ was Nafl and with his people it was Farḍh)[5]. If, on the other hand, this was indeed a statement of Mu‘ādh, it would nevertheless serve as no proof that his actions were carried out under the instruction of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ, or that had the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ been informed of his actions he would have approved of them or would have instructed him to alter them. This would be similar to when ‘Umar Ibn 'l-Khaṭṭāb - may Allāh be pleased with him – was informed by Rifā‘ah ibn Rāfi‘ that the people used to have intimacy in the time of the Messenger of Allāh but did not perform Ghusl (bathing) if there was no emission of semen. So ‘Umar Ibn 'l-Khaṭṭāb - may Allāh be pleased with him - replied to them: “Have you informed the Prophet ﷺ about this, and did he approve of it?” Rifā‘ah replied: “No”. So ‘Umar - may Allāh be pleased with him - did not consider this as proof of their activity being sanctioned. Similarly, were it established that Mu‘ādh performed Salāh in the manner claimed during the time of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ, it would be of no evidence that this was commanded by the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ, and instead we have narrated from the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ proof of the opposite: Fahd narrated to us from Yaḥyā Ibn Ṣāliḥ - (al-Ṭaḥāwī with a different chain) likewise ‘Alī Ibn ‘Abd 'l-Raḥmān narrated to us from ‘Abdullāh ibn Maslamah ibn Qa‘nab - they both (Yaḥyā Ibn Ṣāliḥ and ‘Abdullāh ibn Maslamah) said Sulaymān ibn Bilāl narrated to us that he said, ‘Amr ibn Yaḥyā al-Māzinī narrated to us from Mu‘ādh ibn Rifā‘ah al-Zuraqī that a man from Banū Salamah called Sulaym came to the Prophet ﷺ and complained: “We remain continuously working in the day and return in the evening and pray. Then Mu‘ādh comes and announces the call to prayer (‘Ishā') to which we attend, but he lengthens his recitation over us (i.e. lengthens the duration of Ṣalāh)”. So the Prophet ﷺ replied: “O Mu‘ādh, do not be a cause of discord. Either pray with me or relieve your people (by shortening the recitation)”.[6] So this instruction of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ to Mu‘ādh is proof that the Prophet ﷺ was of the belief that Mu‘ādh was doing one of two things; either perfoming Ṣalāh with him or with his people - not both. Because he ﷺ said: "Either pray with me" - meaning; do not pray with your people for a second time - "or relieve your people" - meaning; do not pray with me (but pray with your people, shortening the recitation).
[1] He is: Imām Abū Ja‘far Aḥmad Ibn Muḥammad al-Ṭaḥāwī رحمه الله [d. 321]. [2] Sharḥ Ma‘ānī 'l-Āthār, 4 vols. (Beirut: ‘Alam al-Kutub, 1994), [1:408-410]. [3] Ibn Qudāmah, al-Mughnī (2/31) [4] Few Scholars have rejected Ibn Jurayj's narrations where he didn't caregorically affirm the hearing of the narrations, refer to Siyar A‘lām 'l-Nubalā', Imām al-Dhahabī (6/331). [5] Mulla ‘Alī al-Qārī mentions something similar in his Mirqāt 'l-Mafātīḥ (1/691), he says: 'Mu‘ādh prayed with the Prophet ﷺ with the intention of Nafl to learn the Sunnah of Ṣalāh and to take barakah from it.' [6] This is a mursal narration - also related in Musnad Aḥmad (#20199) and Mu‘jam 'l-Kabīr of al-Ṭabarānī (6/67 #622). Imam al-Haythamī comments in his Majma‘ 'l-Zawā'id (2/72 #2371): '...and the narrators of Aḥmad are trustworthy.'
|
|
|
Post by AbuHumayd on Sept 17, 2015 16:09:21 GMT
The following is a short treatise linking the Ḥanafī Madhab, one of the great schools of jurisprudence established during the time of the Salaf, to one of the great Companions of the Prophet ﷺ, ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd, and for the most part this treatise also serves as an answer to the accusations made against this great companion with regards to his credentials in the Islāmic sciences. علاقة مذهب أبي حنيفة النعمان بعبد الله ابن مسعود أبي عبد الرحمان
The Connection of the School of Abū Ḥanīfah al-Nu‘mān with ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd Abū ‘Abd 'l-Raḥmān
Imām Abū Ḥanīfah's chain of knowledge is as follows: Imām Abū Ḥanīfah | Ḥammād Ibn Abī Sulaymān | Ibrahīm al-Nakha‘ī | ‘Alqamah Ibn Qays | ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd | Rasūlullāh ﷺ 1. Imām Abū Ḥanīfah al-Nu‘mān Ibn Thābit: he took over the seat of teaching in Kūfā after his teacher Ḥammād Ibn Abī Sulaymān passed away, and was recognised as his main student.[1] 2. Ḥammād Ibn Abī Sulaymān: he was the most learned of the students of Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī and the most noble.[2] 3. Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī: he was born into a family of Scholars, he succeeded ‘Alqamah Ibn Qays, his maternal uncle.[3] He was also regarded as those who were most knowledgeable in regards to opinions and views of ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd.[4] 4. ‘Alqamah Ibn Qays: he was a highly recognised student of ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd to the extent that he was regarded as the closest of the people in terms of attributes, conduct and habit, to ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd.[5] 5. He is ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd (May Allāh be pleased with him), he was a noteable ṣaḥābī (companion) of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ and died in the year 33 or 34 ḥijrī. He has many outstanding virtues which would be far too lengthy to mention here. It suffices to say that there was not a field that he himself did not excel in, this is because of his attachment to the Messenger ﷺ and always being in close proximity to him; learning from him, helping him [doing his khidmah], asking questions related to the Dīn to the extent that even onlookers would think that he was part of the Ahl 'l-Bayt [The Messenger's ﷺ family]. Imām Shams 'l-Dīn al-Dhahabī writes in his Siyar: وأخرج البخاري والنسائي من حديث أبي موسى قال: قدمت أنا وأخي من اليمن، فمكثنا حينا، وما نحسب ابن مسعود وأمه إلا من أهل بيت النبي - صلى الله عليه وسلم - لكثرة دخولهم وخروجهم عليه . '(Imām) al-Bukhārī and (Imām) al-Nasā'ī narrated from a narration of Abū Mūsā that he said: 'Me and my brother came from Yemen [to Madīnah] and stayed for sometime, we were then led to believe that Ibn Mas‘ūd and his mother were part of the household of the Prophet ﷺ due to their constant going in and out [from the house]'.[6] He goes on to narrate further: منصور والأعمش: عن أبي وائل قال: كنت مع حذيفة، فجاء ابن مسعود، فقال حذيفة: إن أشبه الناس هديا ودلا وقضاء وخطبة برسول الله - صلى الله عليه وسلم - من حين يخرج من بيته، إلى أن يرجع، لا أدري ما يصنع في أهله 'Manṣūr and al-A‘mash [both] narrate from Abū Wā'il that he said we were with Ḥudhayfah while Ibn Mas‘ūd went by, so Ḥudhayfah said [regarding Ibn Mas‘ūd]: 'Verily, [he was] the closest of the people to the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ in terms of conduct, habit, judgement and speech, until he went in his home [after which we did not know]'.[7] ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd - The Narrator of Ḥadīthعن حذيفة قال كنا جلوسا عند النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم فقال إني لا أدري ما قدر بقائي فيكم فاقتدوا باللذين من بعدي وأشار إلى أبي بكر وعمر واهتدوا بهدي عمار وما حدثكم ابن مسعود فصدقوه هذا حديث حسن وروى إبراهيم بن سعد هذا الحديث عن سفيان الثوري عن عبد الملك بن عمير عن هلال مولى ربعي عن ربعي عن حذيفة عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم نحوه وقد روى سالم المرادي الكوفي عن عمرو بن هرم عن ربعي بن حراش عن حذيفة عن النبي صلى الله عليه وسلم نحو هذا From Ḥudhayfah that he said: 'We were sitting with the Prophet ﷺ and he said: 'I do not know how long I will be amongst you, so stick to the two after me,' and he signalled towards Abu Bakr and ‘Umar, 'be guided through the example of ‘Ammār and whatever Ibn Mas‘ūd narrates to you believe it [accept it]'.[8] [Imām al-Tirmidhī said] This is a ḥasan ḥadīth, Ibrāhīm Ibn Sa‘d narrates this ḥadīth from Suyān al-Thawrī from ‘Abd 'l-Mālik Ibn ‘Umayr from Hilāl the Mawlā of Rib‘ī from Rib‘ī from Ḥudhayfah from the Prophet ﷺ similar to the above. Sālim al-Murādī al-Kūfī also narrated the same from ‘Amr Ibn Harim from Rib‘ī Ibn Ḥirāsh from Ḥudhayfah from Prophet ﷺ similar to the above.[9] ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd - The Mufassir (Qur'ānic Exegete)قال عبد الله رضي الله عنه والله الذي لا إله غيره ما أنزلت سورة من كتاب الله إلا أنا أعلم أين أنزلت ولا أنزلت آية من كتاب الله إلا أنا أعلم فيم أنزلت ولو أعلم أحدا أعلم مني بكتاب الله تبلغه الإبل لركبت إليه ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd said: 'By Allāh besides whom there is no God, there is not a sūrah that was revealed from the Book of Allāh except that I am the most knowledgable regarding where it was revealed, and there is not an āyah from the Book of Allāh that was revealed except that I am the most knowledgeable regarding its [reason for] revelation, and if I were to know of anyone more knowledgeable than me regarding the book of Allāh who was within [the distance of] a camel's journey, I would surely travel to him'.[10] ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd - The Faqīh (Jurisprudent)The statement of ‘Umar Ibn al-Khaṭṭāb regarding Ibn Mas‘ūd's jurisprudential skills proves he also excelled in this field: عَنْ زَيْدِ بْنِ وَهْبٍ، قَالَ: أَقْبَلَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ ذَاتَ يَوْمٍ وَعُمَرُ جَالِسٌ، فَقَالَ: "كُنَيْفٌ مُلِئَ فِقْهًا " From Zayd Ibn Wahb, he said: ‘Abdullāh came by one day whilst ‘Umar was sitting, so he [‘Umar] said: 'He [Ibn Mas‘ūd] is a person filled with [the knowledge of] fiqh'.[11] It is sufficient to mention that Imām al-Dhahabī gives him the title of Faqīh 'l-Ummah (The Jurist of the Ummah)[12]. ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd - The Natural Leaderعَنْ عَلِيٍّ رَضِيَ اللَّهُ عَنْهُ، قَالَ: قَالَ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَآلِهِ وَسَلَّمَ: "لَوْ كُنْتُ مُسْتَخْلِفًا أَحَدًا مِنْ غَيْرِ مَشُورَةٍ، لاسْتَخْلَفْتُ عَلَيْهِمُ ابْنَ أُمِّ عَبْدٍ". هَذَا حَدِيثٌ صَحِيحُ الإِسْنَادِ، وَلَمْ يُخَرِّجَاهُ From ‘Alī may Allah be pleased with him, that he said: The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: 'If I were to appoint a leader (khalīfah) without consultation then I would appoint over them Ibn Ummi 'Abd (Ibn Mas‘ūd)'. [Imām al-Ḥākim says] This is a ḥadīth which has an authentic chain although it was not narrated in the ṣaḥīḥayn'.[13] ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd - The Qārī (Reciter) عن عبد الله بن عمرو قال قال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم: خذوا القرآن من أربعة من عبد الله بن مسعود وسالم ومعاذ بن جبل وأبي بن كعب From ‘Abdullāh Ibn ‘Amr that he said: the Messenger of Allāh said: 'Take the Qur‘ān [meaning it's recitation] from four (people), from ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd, Sālim, Mu‘ādh Ibn Jabal, and Ubayy Ibn Ka‘b'.[14] Points of Benefit:One thing the above Imāms have in common is that they were all distinguished students of their teachers. This chain of knowledge containing intellectuals of the highest calibre from their respective times has been summarised in Radd 'l-Muḥtār of ‘Allāmah Ibn ‘Ābidīn al-Shāmī as follows: الفقه زرعه عبد الله بن مسعود رضي الله عنه ، وسقاه علقمة ، وحصده إبراهيم النخعي ، وداسه حماد ، وطحنه أبو حنيفة ، وعجنه أبو يوسف وخبزه محمد ، فسائر الناس يأكلون من خبزه 'Fiqh was planted by ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd, irrigated by ‘Alqamah, harvested by Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī, threshed by Ḥammād [Ibn Abī Sulaymān], milled by Abū Ḥanīfah, kneaded by Abū Yūsuf, and then baked by Muḥammad [Ibn 'l-Ḥasan al-Shaybani]. [And now] the rest of Muslims are eating from his bread.'[15] ConclusionIt is manifest that the great companion ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd was a Mujtahid of highest repute, and left no field except that he had mastered it.
[1] Imām al-Dhahabī, Siyar A‘lām 'l-Nubalā (5/232) [2] Ibid. [3] Ibid (4/521) [4] Imām Dāraqūṭnī, Sunan al-Dāraqūṭnī (3/94 no. 3319) [5] Ibid (4/55), Imām al-Dhahabī writes: وكان يشبه بابن مسعود في هديه ودله وسمته [6] Ibid (1/469) [7] Ibid (1/471), also narrated in al-Bukhārī. [8] In other narrations the wording is: وتمسكوا بعهد ابن مسعود 'Hold tightly to the order of Ibn Mas‘ūd', refer to Musnad 'l-Ḥumaydī (#436). [9] Imām al-Tirmidhī, Jāmi‘ 'l-Tirmidhī (#3799) [10] Imām al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ'l-Bukhārī (#4716) [11] Imām Ibn Abī Shaybah, al-Muṣannaf (#31557)
[12] Imām al-Dhahabī, Siyar A‘lām 'l-Nubalā (1/462)
[13] Imām al-Ḥākim, Mustadrak ‘ala 'l-Ṣaḥīḥayn (#5354)
[14] Imām al-Bukhārī, Ṣaḥīḥ 'l-Bukhārī (#4713)
[15] ‘Allāmah Ibn ‘Ābidīn, Radd 'l-Muḥtār (1/51)
|
|
|
Post by AbuHumayd on Sept 10, 2015 13:31:39 GMT
The [acceptance of the] Marāsīl of Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī from ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd (May Allah be pleased with him) Imām al-Dāraqūṭnī[1] quotes a very important principle in his Sunan[2] regarding the Mursal[3] narrations of Ibrāhīm al-Nakha’ī from ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd (May Allah be pleased with him), after citing a few narrations, he says: "[Henceforth] these narrations; even though they are mursal, [is not a problem] as Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī was the most knowledgable of ‘Abdullāh (Ibn Mas‘ūd) with regards to his opinions and his religious edicts. He took [all of] that [knowledge] from his uncles; ‘Alqamah, al-Aswad and ‘Abd 'l-Raḥmān the two sons Yazīd and many others from amongst the major companions of ‘Abdullāh (Ibn Mas‘ūd). It is on record that he (Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī) said: 'If I narrate to you saying ‘Abdullāh Ibn Mas‘ūd said', then it is from a group of his (Ibn Mas‘ūd's) companions that narrated from him [from which al-Nakha‘ī then took], but if I hear a narration from one man I will name him for you."[4]
[1] Imām al-Dāraqūṭnī رحمه الله [d. 385 AH] [2] Sunan al-Dāraqūṭnī (3/94 no. 3319), Dār 'l-Mu'ayyad ed. Beirut, 2001: فَهَذِهِ الرِّوَايَةُ وَإِنْ كَانَ فِيهَا إِرْسَالٌ فَإِبْرَاهِيمُ النَّخَعِيُّ هُوَ أَعْلَمُ النَّاسِ بِعَبْدِ اللَّهِ وَبِرَأْيِهِ وَبِفُتْيَاهُ ، قَدْ أَخَذَ ذَلِكَ عَنْ أَخْوَالِهِ عَلْقَمَةَ ، وَالْأَسْوَدِ ، وَعَبْدِ الرَّحْمَنِ ابْنَيْ يَزِيدَ ، وَغَيْرِهِمْ مِنْ كُبَرَاءِ أَصْحَابِ عَبْدِ اللَّهِ ، وَهُوَ الْقَائِلُ: " إِذَا قُلْتُ لَكُمْ: قَالَ عَبْدُ اللَّهِ بْنُ مَسْعُودٍ فَهُوَ عَنْ جَمَاعَةٍ مِنْ أَصْحَابِهِ عَنْهُ ، وَإِذَا سَمِعْتُهُ مِنْ رَجُلٍ وَاحِدٍ سَمَّيْتُهُ لَكُمْ [3] Mursal narrations are narrations which omit a narrator to the Prophet ﷺ or the Companions. [4] A slightly different version is recorded in other books of Rijāl from Ibrāhīm al-Nakha‘ī, refer to Tah dhīb 'l-Tahdhīb of Ḥāfiẓ Ibn Ḥajar al-‘Asqalānī (1/ #325) and Siyar A'lām 'l-Nubalā' of Imām al-Dhahabī (4/528).
|
|
|
Post by AbuHumayd on Sept 9, 2015 11:06:36 GMT
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
Translator's preface The following passage is translated from a well known book[1] by Imām Muḥammad Ibn Mufliḥ, whom is known to be an erudite Scholar in the Ḥanbalī School of his era. This book is dedicated solely to the ettiquettes of our Religion (Dīn) known as Ādāb. The following is a short passage on the importance of the duty of a Muslim to their fellow Muslims in Dīn and the importance of advising fellow brothers to the righteous path. It points out the things we tend to miss in this day an age [especially with the rampant usage of social media i.e. Facebook, Twitter etc]. Ultimately it will also serve as a reminder for us all.
في حق المسلم على المسلم The Rights of one Muslim over Another
Imām Muḥammad Ibn Mufliḥ al-Maqdisī al-Ḥanbalī رحمه الله [d. 763 AH] From the duties of a Muslim to another Muslim is to cover his sins [done privately, if he comes to know of them], to forgive his faults, to advise him passionately, to help him mend his ways, to accept his excuses, not pay attention to [anyone] backbiting [him], to hold on to his advices, to preserve his character, to take care of his [mutual] agreement, to answer his call, to accept his gifts, to keep that bond [of brotherhood], to be thankful for his help, to be kind in his asistance, to go out in his need, to [help] cure his problems, to make du‘ā' [by seeking his guidance] at his sneezing, to speak out against his misguidance, [to be] his friend, to not antagonise him, to help him against his oppressors, to stop him from oppressing others, to not run him, to not let him down, to love for him what you love for yourself, to dislike for him what you dislike for yourself, this was [all] mentioned in al-Ri‘āyah. Ḥanbal said: I heard Abū ‘Abdillāh [Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal] say: 'It is not mandatory upon the Muslims to give advice [pertaining to Dīn] to a dhimmī[2]; rather he should advise the Muslims'. The Prophet ﷺ said: 'Advice [should be given] to every Muslim'.[3] The meaning of this - and Allāh knows best - is that it [giving naṣīḥah] is a communal obligation (farḍh ‘ala 'l-kifāyah)[4]. al-Marūdhī said: I heard Abū ‘Abdullāh [Aḥmad Ibn Ḥanbal] say: A man said to Mis‘ar: 'Do you like to give advice (naṣīḥah)? He [Mis‘ar] replied: Whomsoever advises, then yes. As for gloating [about it] then no'. ‘Abdullāh Ibn ‘Abd 'l-Barr mentioned in Bahjat 'l-Majālis from Mis‘ar that he said: 'May Allāh have mercy upon him who gives guidance to me of my faults in private between me and him [the advisor], for the advice [given] in public is scolding'. Aḥmad and Muslim narrated from Tamīm al-Dārī marfū‘an[5] [to the Prophet ﷺ]: 'Verily (َّ اِن) Religion is sincerity (naṣīḥah), we replied: For whom O Messenger of Allāh? For Allāh, for His Book, for His Messenger, for the leaders of the Muslims and the general Muslims'.[6] Imām Muslim did not narrate it with the first word 'Verily', and Abū Dāwūd[7] narrated it mentioning ' إن الدين النصيحة' was repeated three times. Al-Nasā'ī[8] narrated it with 'Innamā' وإنما الدين' 'النصيحة and he mentioned it [the full ḥadīth]. Its apparent [meaning] is that the foundation of the Religion and Islām is upon this statement. Some [of the Scholars] have said it and a group of them mentioned it is one of the four narrations that is gathered to form the basis of Islām. Al-Khaṭṭābī said: 'The meaning of the ḥadīth is [that] the foundation of [our] religion and its pillar is good advice / well wishing, like his ﷺ saying: Ḥajj is ‘Arafah'. [meaning it is one of its pillars].[9]
[1] al-Ādāb 'l-Shar‘iyyah wa 'l-Manḥ 'l-Mariyyah (1/290), Imām Muḥammad Ibn Mufliḥ al-Maqdisī al-Ḥanbalī [d. 763 AH] [2] Dhimmī: Non Muslims living under Muslim rulership, under their protection. [3] Jarīr Ibn ‘Abdillāh ؓ said that he took bay‘ah to Rasūlullāh ﷺ and was given the condition to give [good] advice to the Muslims. Ṣaḥīḥ 'l-Bukhārī (#2526) [4] Communal obligagtion: It is an Islamic term in reference to an act being obligated on a handful of people in a community, if not fulfilled it would be imperative for others [in that community] to fill in their gap. If not, the whole community will be sinful. Refer to Baḥr 'l-Muḥīṭ li 'l-Zarkashī (1/321). [5] Marfū‘: Words or actions attrbiuted directly to the Prophet ﷺ. [6] Musnad Aḥmad (#16602), Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim (#85) [7] Sunan Abī Dāwūd (#4295) [8] Sunan 'l-Sughrā li 'l-Nasā'ī (#4150) [9] Sharḥ 'l-Nawawī ‘ala Muslim, Imām al-Nawawī (1/230), also mentioned in Mirqāt 'l-Mafātīḥ, Mullā ‘Alī al-Qārī (7/3112).
|
|
|
Post by AbuHumayd on Sept 2, 2015 19:33:17 GMT
Posted as recieved: There is a video doing the rounds on social media, showing a man doing tawaf on a set of electronic wheels. People are asking about its permissibility. From Maulana Badrul Islam:Tawaf must be done on foot, unless one is physically incapable of doing so. If one does tawaf in a wheelchair, electronic board, scooter, roller skates or anything similar (i.e. not on foot), he must repeat the tawaf as long as he is still in Makkah. If not, he must give the expiation of a dam (sacrifice). This is wajib. من واجبات الطواف السبعة:
الرابع: المشي فيه للقادر. فلو طاف راكبا أو محمولا أو زحفا بلا عذر، فعليه الإعادة أو الدم.
(إرشاد الساري إلى مناسك الملا علي القاري، ص215 ط. مؤسسة الريان)
From the 7 wajibat of tawaf, the 4th is that the one doing tawaf does it on foot. ( Irshad al-Sari ila Manasik al-Mulla 'Ali al-Qari, p. 215) The above, obviously, is the hanafi fatwa. The man in the video could be a non-hanafi.
|
|