|
Post by IbnNurAlShanti on Aug 14, 2015 13:43:46 GMT
Fadha'il A'maal vs Kitaab ar-RuhBy Shaykh Mohammad Yasir al-Hanafi
The pseudo-salafis of the age have made it a part of their da'wah to hurl insults at those who narrate weak ahadith in virtues, especially when it comes to Fadha'il Amaal. Their common objections regarding this amazing book are usually on three issues:
1. Fabricated hadith 2. Weak hadith 3. Strange stories
Using the above objections they deceive the people and dissuade them from reading Fadha'il Amaal. We often hear them encouraging people to throw it out or burn it. This video will clearly show how futile their objections are and that the scholars they align themselves to have gone even further than what they accuse Shaykh Zakariyyah (rahimahullah) of. Will they go back and burn the books of those they admire? What is their fatwa regarding this?
Note: The two fatawa of Shaykh Ibn Uthaymin on Kitab al-Ruh mentioned in the video which affirms it's attribution to Hafiz Ibn al-Qayyim can be found in the following links:
|
|
|
Post by IbnNurAlShanti on Aug 14, 2015 13:51:02 GMT
Recently, Shaykh Mohammad Yasir al-Hanafi shared a strange narration found in Kitab al-Ruh of Hafiz Ibn al-Qayyim ؒ . The purpose of sharing this narration in his video was to answer those individuals who accuse Shaykh al-Hadith Mawlana Muhammad Zakariyya al-Kandhalwi's ؒ Fada'il A'mal of containing strange stories. The narration found in Kitab al-Ruh states:
وقد ذكر ابن أبى الدنيا في كتاب القبور عن الشعبى أنه ذكر رجلا قال للنبي مررت ببدر فرأيت رجلا يخرج من الأرض فيضربه رجل بمقمعة حتى يغيب في الأرض ثم يخرج فيفعل به ذلك فقال رسول الله ذاك أبو جهل بن هشام يعذب إلى يوم القيامة
It has been narrated by Ibn Abi 'l-Dunya in Kitab al-Qubur from Sha'bi that he mentioned a man said to the Prophet ﷺ: "I passed by Badr and saw a man coming out of the earth. Another man was hitting him with a hammer until he disappeared into the earth, then climbing out again. This occurred many times." Then, the Prophet ﷺ said: "That is Abu Jahl Ibn Hisham being punished until the day of judgement."
The full chain for the narration is found in Ibn Abi 'l-Dunya's Kitab al-Qubur [4/536 (8425)]. He narrates from his father, who narrates from Hushaym, who narrates from Mujalid Ibn Sa'id, from Sha'bi, from the Prophet ﷺ.
Firstly, Imam Sha'bi is a tabi'i (he did not meet the Prophet ﷺ,) so this hadith is mursal (it has a broken link). Although a mursal hadith can be authenticated, there are certain criteria which must be met. This narration does not meet them: firstly, Imam Sha'bi is among the junior tabi'in; secondly, a narrator within the chain is weak; and thirdly, it contradicts other sahih (authenticated) hadiths.
The narration is also found in al-Bidayah of Imam Ibn Kathir:
وقال الأموي في " مغازيه " : سمعت أبي ، ثنا المجالد بن سعيد ، عن عامر قال : جاء رجل إلى رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم فقال : إني رأيت رجلا جالسا في بدر ورجل يضرب رأسه بعمود من حديد ، حتى يغيب في الأرض . فقال رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم : ذاك أبو جهل ، وكل به ملك يفعل به كلما خرج ، فهو يتجلجل فيها إلى يوم القيامة
Both chains in Kitab al-Qubur and al-Bidayah contain a narrator by the name Mujalid ibn Sa'id, who has been criticised by many scholars:
Imam Bukhari, in his Al-Tarikh al-Kabir, states regarding Mujalid:
كان يحيى القطان يضعفه ، وكان ابن مهدي لا يروي عنه عن الشعبي
"Yahya al-Qattan used to weaken him, and Ibn Mahdi used to not relate his [Mujalid's] narrations from al-Sha'bi."
This is the case in both of the above narrations.
Further regarding Mujalid Ibn Sa'id, al-Tirmidhi narrates a hadith wherein he appears in the chain; he then says:
وهذا حديث ليس إسناده بالقائم ، لأن مجالد بن سعيد قد ضعفه بعض أهل العلم ، منهم : أحمد بن حنبل
"This is a hadith the isnad of which is not established because Mujalid Ibn Sa'id has been weakened by some of the people of knowledge, one of whom is Ahmad Ibn Hanbal." [Jami' al-Tirmidhi 3/429 (1119)]
Imam al-Haythami narrates a hadith from from Musnad Abu Ya'la and says:
وفي إسناد أبي يعلى مجالد بن سعيد ، وهو ضعيف .
"And in the isnad of Abu Ya'la is Mujalid Ibn Sa'id, and he is weak". [Majma' al-Zawai'd (5/108)]
Even a Mutasahil (lenient) scholar like Imam Ibn Hibban weakened him severely and placed him in his book al-Majruhin:
من أهل الكوفة ، يروي عن الشعبي ، وقيس بن أبي خازم ، روى عنه أهل العراق ، مات سنة ثلاث أو أربع وأربعين ومائة من ذي الحجة ، وكان رديء الحفظ ، يقلب الأسانيد ، ويرفع المراسيل ، لا يجوز الاحتجاج به.
"(Mujalid) is from amongst the people of Kufa. He narrates from al-Sha'bi and Qays Ibn Abi Khazim. The people of Iraq have narrated from him (Mujalid). He died 143 or 144 AH in the month of Dhu 'l-Hijjah. He had a poor memory: he used to change isnads and raise the marasil [broken chains] (to marfu', i.e. he used to attribute them to the Prophet ﷺ). It is not permissible to use him as proof".
After narrating a hadith of Mujalid, al-Shawkani rightly sums him up as saying:
وحديث ابن مسعود أخرجه أيضا البيهقي في شعب الإيمان والبزار ، وفي إسناده مجالد بن سعيد ، وثقه النسائي وضعفه جماعة
"The hadith of Ibn Mas'ud is also narrated by al-Bayhaqi in Shu'ab al-Iman, and [by] al-Bazzar. Its isnad entails Mujalid Ibn Sa'id; al-Nasa'i accredited him (tawthiq), and a group [of scholars] weakened him". [Nayl al-Awtar (8/301)]
In conclusion:
1. The narration is mursal and cannot be attributed to the Prophet ﷺ.
2. Mujalid bin Sa'id is not a reliable narrator as he has been found, by several scholars of hadith, to have many faults.
- One should also note that this narration does not exist in any of the major works of hadith, which is a sign that it is not accepted by the hadith scholars.
- It also contradicts the established opinion that the 'Adhab al-Qabr (punishment of the grave) takes place inside the grave and not outside of it.
- It contradicts the hadith of the Prophet ﷺ that one does not hear the punishment of the grave (let alone witness it!). The Prophet ﷺ said: "... Were you not [at risk of abandoning the] burying of your deceased, I would have asked Allah ﷻ to make you hear the punishment of the grave that I hear." [Muslim (2867)]
- The narrations from Kitab al-Ruh and al-Bidayah both mention that Abu Jahl climbed out of the earth. This goes against the well-known hadith of Bukhari that Abu Jahl was thrown (along with the other disbelievers) into a well on the day of Badr. [Al-Bukhari (3185)]
In light of all of the above, this narration cannot be considered a reliable hadith, and those who have attempted to defend it are mistaken.
May Allah ﷻ forgive us for any shortcomings.
|
|
|
Post by IbnNurAlShanti on Aug 24, 2015 21:08:08 GMT
Are Salafis Trained To Practice Double Standards By Shaykh Mohammad Yasir al-Hanafi Salafis have a big problem with the stories in Fadha'il A'maal. Alhamdulillah, I've proven in the past that their CREED BOOKS have far more strange stories than our books on virtues, but for some reason no pseudo-salafi is willing to issue a barbaric fatwa against their books, especially Kitāb Al-Ruh. I wonder why? It's only fair that they also question those books which were written hundreds of years before Fadha'il A'maal. Some may argue, "Akhi we don't promote Kitāb Al-Ruh", this is absurd! The salafis should define the word "promote" to us. If Saudi Arabia is printing the book in its hundreds and thousands and nearly every book store in Saudi Arabia sells it, as well as the fact that you can find it online in different languages; such as al-Maktabah al-Shamela which has it under the section of AQEEDAH, how is this NOT promotion? If it isn't then I wonder what is. Anyway, I've compared Fadha'il A'maal and Kitāb al-Ruh in my previous video, and believe me Fadha'il A'maal is far more authentic; even though Kitāb al-Ruh is under the section of CREED and Fadha'il A'maal is a book of virtues. Another story in Fadha'il A'maal which the pseudo-salafis have a problem with, is where a person is given a piece of bread by the Prophet ﷺ in a dream. He eats half of it and then when he wakes up, he finds the other half of the bread is in his hand. But guess what is in Kitāb al-Ruh? Allah bless Hafiz Ibn al-Qayyim, he's mentioned a story on page 224 (al-Maktabah al-Asriyyah print), that a person in his dream was given PIG to eat by a black person, when this person ate the PIG (not bread) in his dream and then woke up, for TWO MONTHS he could smell the PIG in his mouth! ? I wonder what the over-zealous salafis have to say about this story in their CREED BOOK? It would be nice to see their Fatwa menu regarding this story. Shukran. (Shaykh) Mohammad Yasir al-Hanafi
|
|